Choices for the Authentic Self Under Medical Coercion
Choices for the Authentic Self Under Medical Coercion: Trauma Expert Gabor Maté Still Ignores the Elephant in the Room
I write
this critique of trauma expert Gabor Maté with some reluctance because I have
admired his work for a long time. I wish it were not necessary to do this again
because this is my second time to address his stance on the mandates for the
experimental mRNA therapy. Yet I feel it is essential to write this because he
has continued to speak with great hypocrisy on this matter while he enjoys
glowing reviews and flattering interviews during the promotional tour of his
new book The Myth of Normal. I could let it go if he were not someone
seeking a large, sympathetic audience and if he were not revered as an expert
on trauma.
I wrote the previous essay about Dr. Maté after I heard him claim in an
interview that a university student who didn’t want to take the mRNA treatment
was free to make that choice, but “he doesn’t have to go to university” if he
doesn’t want to comply with the coercion to take a medical treatment. I was
stunned to hear him take this position, considering his life story as a
Holocaust survivor and an expert on trauma.
In spite of
his reputation for being a contrarian thinker and critic of capitalism’s
destructive effects on mental health, he took a completely conventional, incurious,
and conformist view of the most traumatizing and socially divisive issue to
emerge in the last twenty years—one that was brought to us by the
pharmaceutical industry and the “charitable foundations” that are part and
parcel of that destructive capitalism.
Instead of
engaging with the critiques of vaccination policy made by the medical experts
who formed the great Great Barrington Declaration (and numerous other experts
in other organizations), he focused his attention on examples of powerless people
who were having an apparently irrational response to the mandates because they
were being triggered, supposedly, by unresolved childhood trauma.
Dr. Maté
never bothered to face the truth about the “vaccines” that emerged soon after
they were injected into millions: It was a lie that the mRNA treatments are
safe and effective. They do have harmful effects. They have done nothing to
stop the spread of the virus, and there is no benefit to people who are in
reasonably good health, considering the risks. We could say, as the joke goes, “safe
and effective” is not a lie; it’s two lies. The only ethical position to take
was that no one should be coerced into taking these treatments in order to
avoid becoming a pariah. Dr. Maté has stressed repeatedly in his lectures, books,
and interviews that social isolation is the worst thing a human can suffer, and
it has devastating effects on mental and physical health over the long term,
especially if one suppresses one’s true self in order to please others.
If he
doesn’t address this horrible position he took about the vaccines and renounce
it, I don’t see why anyone should buy his new book or take him seriously in the
numerous interviews he has given recently to promote it. I’m not saying he should
be dismissed entirely. I admired his work, and I might again, but before I do
that, all he has to do is admit he got it wrong. It could be a good example of
one of his humble admissions of how he let his own past trauma get the best of
him.
However,
one has to wonder if he has decided to avoid the issue because he knows the
interviews and the favorable reviews would vanish if he took a stance that
would divide his audience. Perhaps he fears the backlash that would come from
suppressing his authentic self. Book sales would decline, and he would be cancelled
and shadow banned just like everyone else who has taken a dissident stance. No
one wants to become the next Eric Clapton. Book sales would decline, and there
would be no more invitations to appear on the CBC or to write editorials for The
Globe and Mail.
It is safe
to assume that he has made a conscious effort to not address the issue. Like
many celebrities who agree to interviews, he probably set conditions about what
questions he would not answer and which topics he would not discuss. For
example, in his long interview with Joe Rogan in September 2022, the pandemic
was mentioned only briefly toward the end of the conversation.[1] And this was Joe Rogan—the
guy who was the victim of an abusive media shitstorm in 2021 when he recovered within
a few days, while unvaccinated, from a SARS-Cov-2 infection. He credited his
recovery to alternative treatments (including the forbidden ivermectin) and healthy
living—something that the officially-sanctioned “science” never endorsed. There
is no way that the pandemic and all its controversies was not the enormous
elephant in the room during this interview when the topic was “healing from
trauma.” This omission had to have been pre-arranged.
The same
omission was evident in Dr. Maté’s interview with Chris Hedges,[2] who is himself another
example of a political analyst and harsh critic of capitalism for whom the
pandemic seems to be invisible. Thomas Harrington recently wrote an excellent essay on high-profile writers on the left
who have chosen not to write anything critical about the vaccine push by the
pharmaceutical industry for the last two years. They used to write about the
shortcomings of privatized medical care and the crimes of the pharmaceutical industry
in the opioid crisis, but they’ve been silent on the pandemic response and the
money that was spent by the industry to promote vaccines as the only way to
“get back to normal.”
I have also
noticed the omission in the appearances of Dr. Maté’s son Aaron on the Jimmy
Dore show. Jimmy Dore has been a constant harsh critic of the vaccine push throughout
the 2021-22 period, with many searing tirades recorded weekly against Anthony
Fauci and the “shitlib” segment of society that has treated him as a hero. Yet
when Aaron Maté appeared on the show in mid-2022 (after a long, unexplained
absence as a regular guest), other matters were discussed, even though the
pandemic is the elephant in the room on the Jimmy Dore show, just as it is in
Joe Rogan’s studio. Aaron Maté writes for The Grayzone, which has
published a few articles critical of the covid response, so it is probably a
delicate matter for Aaron to dodge with his colleagues there as well.[3] I could only conclude that
Jimmy and Aaron had a tense falling out for a while, and Aaron stayed away
because the show was an embarrassing direct attack on views held by his father,
but now they have agreed to work together again with an understanding that they
won’t discuss anything that would be awkward for the Maté family.
To
illustrate Dr. Maté’s hypocrisy in more detail, below there are some excerpts
from Dr. Maté’s interview with Brian Rose.[4] This was a softball
interview in which the host avoided asking the pertinent questions about the traumatizing
social disruption that, it appears, is a sort of Lord Voldemort—the pandemic
for some is “he who shall not be named.” However, it did come up briefly in the
interview, but it was quickly put aside. Dr. Maté was careful not to mention
his endorsement of coercive medical treatment, and Brian Rose never asked about
it, probably because of a prior agreement.
It is odd
that Brian Rose would avoid this topic because he interviewed the often-maligned
radical alleged “conspiracy nut” David Icke early in the pandemic.[5] In that interview, Icke claimed
the pandemic response was an engineered social crisis designed to transfer
wealth upward and consolidate the power of transnational elites. Brian Rose
seemed sympathetic to his views and never challenged him. He was willing to
give him a platform, so it is curious that he would not ask challenging
questions of Dr. Maté in order to discuss the contradictions between the views
of his two guests.
To suggest
what some challenging questions could have been, I refer to the recent essay by
Thomas Harrington (mentioned above) Why Did the Left Fail the Covid Test So
Badly? that readers can keep in mind.[6] He noted that there is a
curiously long list of people like Gabor Maté—perceptive veteran critics of
capitalism and US foreign policy—who ignored the globally coordinated virus
response and failed to apply their sharp analytical skills to it. He listed
several propaganda-savvy journalists and journals he had championed over the
years that failed to notice...
- ·
the
now heavily documented collaboration between the US government and Big Tech in
censoring opinions that go counter to the government’s and Big Pharma’s desired
discourse on Covid
- ·
the
US government’s abrogation of the Nuremberg principle relating to informed
consent and medical experimentation
- ·
experimental
vaccines that were sold to the population on the basis of their ability to stop
infection do not stop infection, and this was known to anyone who read the FDA
briefing papers published when these injections were unleashed on the public
- ·
the
millions of people who lost their jobs over the lies
- ·
the
government’s abject disdain for the longstanding statutory right to object to
medical treatment on religious grounds
- ·
the
mafia-like nature of the vaccine contracts forced upon sovereign countries
around the world
- ·
Pfizer
sought to keep all clinical information relating to the vaccines under wraps
for 75 years
- ·
the
upward transfer of wealth that took place during the years of the Covid state
of exception
- ·
the
trauma imposed on billions of children around the world whose lives were thrown
into chaos by the useless quarantine and masking rules
_____
EXCERPTS
(discussion follows)
Dr. Gabor Maté: The Myth of Normal:
Trauma, Illness & Healing in a Toxic Culture, London Real, October 3,
2022:
6:00~
Gabor Maté:
The pandemic… whatever side of the vaccine debate or the mandate debate one
finds oneself on, globally the pandemic revealed certain aspects of our society
that we should have been aware of before. Didn’t it teach us how important
human contact and communal presence is? Whether you agree with the policies—I’m
not getting into that debate now—but it certainly taught us the importance of
each other, of the we that contains me.
In a lot
of the suspicion and rancor I saw in the Covid debate, I was seeing the effect
of trauma. People couldn’t see another point of view, no matter which side
[they were on] … If a child is given the sense early that the world is not trustworthy,
that’s going to show up in politics. It’s going to show up in our social
discourse.
… I
don’t think they have the technology to introduce microchips into people’s
circulation through a vaccine... [The preacher who believed such microchips
existed] was projecting into the political debate a personal experience of
trauma, not realizing that’s what he was doing.
1:12:05~1:17:00
In
Western medicine, for all the brilliance of Western medical techniques and
curing modalities, there’s still a tendency for the patient to be a passive
recipient of health care rather than being the agent who actually decides what
he’ll accept or not. That’s not helpful to people…
How long
do you survive in the wild if you’re not in touch with your feelings?
… Have
you ever had the experience of having a strong gut feeling, ignoring it, and
feeling sorry afterwards?
…
Something happens to most of us where we have to give up our authenticity, our
connection to ourselves, in order to belong to our family of origin and to our
society, so there is this tension between attachment and authenticity, and we
go for attachment every time. We go for being accepted, being nurtured, and
liked and so on. Once we make that decision—it’s not conscious; it’s
automatic—it becomes our lodestar, and we follow it. We keep choosing
attachment, other people’s acceptance of us, over our own authentic feelings
and opinions and sense of self, and that leads to pathology of mind and body.
… A
child has no choice, but as adults we have to realize the price that we are
paying for not being ourselves. Am I still a helpless child who has to choose
the attachment? … Or… can I choose authenticity instead, even at the risk of
losing some attachment relationships? Or even better, can I choose such adult
attachment relationships where I don’t have to sacrifice my authenticity?
_____
Discussion
Everything
Dr. Maté said in the passage above should be taken as a strong endorsement of
the individual’s right to refuse the experimental mRNA treatments, yet he has
not renounced the position he took previously.
Given the
lack of proven efficacy and safety of the mRNA shots, and the low risk posed by
the virus to the large majority, there was never a threat to the social fabric
that justified the devastating lockdowns and the suppression of the fundamental
right to medical autonomy. Dr. Maté should know all this by now and be willing
to discuss what it means for our severely traumatized society, and he should be
able to see the contradictions in what he said during the interview with Brian
Rose.
… I
don’t think they have the technology to introduce microchips into people’s circulation
through a vaccine... [The preacher who believed such microchips existed] was
projecting into the political debate a personal experience of trauma, not
realizing that’s what he was doing.
This
reaction brings to mind the quote from Hamlet: “There are more things in
heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.” Although Dr.
Maté seems to have found an interesting target to make a point about irrational
conspiracy theories, it turns out that the fear of inserted microchips is not
that far off from what has actually been studied seriously in recent years. For
example, a paper in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice
and Research describes how it is not microchips but rather nanoparticles
that are the focus of attention on this matter of implantation of communication
devices. A quote from the abstract of the paper:
Interdisciplinary
research on the well-documented problems posed to human beings by the injectable
mRNA platforms claiming to address COVID-19 medical complications reveal
surprising, if not deeply troubling, new evidence of apparent fraud and deceit.
Analysis presented here bolsters both the reported laboratory studies of blood
samples from injected subjects and experimental work exploring the potential
reasons for observed phenomena relating to electromagnetic properties exhibited
in human bodies. The impetus for this cross-disciplinary study was current
reports from a substantial proportion of injected subjects who emitted
alphanumeric signals in the frequency range corresponding to Bluetooth
communications networks.[7]
A glance at
the works cited list of this journal article should give pause to anyone who
thinks that concern over implanted devices is a just a pre-occupation of whacko
conspiracy nuts who are living out their unresolved childhood trauma. Consider
also that the smartphone apps that everyone is required to have to prove their
health status might as well be an implanted device or an ankle bracelet,
monitoring citizens as if they were all paroled convicts.
In
Western medicine... there’s still a tendency for the patient to be a passive
recipient of health care rather than being the agent who actually decides what
he’ll accept or not.
… Have
you ever had the experience of having a strong gut feeling, ignoring it, and
feeling sorry afterwards?
... there
is this tension between attachment and authenticity, and we go for attachment
every time... we have to realize the price that we are paying for not being
ourselves...
Am I
still a helpless child who has to choose the attachment? … can I choose adult
attachment relationships where I don’t have to sacrifice my authenticity?
These
excerpts of the longer excerpts above prompt me to wonder why Dr. Maté did not
congratulate Joe Rogan for “expressing healthy anger,” for not being a “passive
recipient of health care,” and for “being the agent who actually decides what
he’ll accept or not.” Like millions of lockdown and mandate skeptics who chose
authenticity over attachment, Joe Rogan listened perhaps to his “strong gut
feeling” that Anthony Fauci, the media, and the government agencies were
perpetrating a massive fraud[8] and a witch-hunt,[9] and so he didn’t have to be
sorry afterward that he didn’t listen to his gut feeling. Intuition was just as
important as reading the facts presented and the rational arguments made by
hundreds of dissenting scientists, social scientists, and lawyers. Joe Rogan
rejected childish attachment to dishonest and foolish authority figures, found
new friends, and risked losing the successful podcast that has made him
wealthy. However, the backlash in the fall of 2021 was more than he expected,
and he seems to have backed away from controversy since then in order to save
his show. There must be a long list of celebrities now who think twice about
accepting an invitation to interview with him. This caution seemed evident in
this interview with Dr. Maté because he appears to have gone along with a request
to not discuss the pandemic in order to have a high-profile guest on his
podcast.
Perhaps
Joe Rogan can be forgiven for wanting to steer clear of controversy because he
has done enough already by sticking his neck out at the peak of the vaccination
panic. There are so many other high-profile people and medical professionals
who could step up but have chosen to stay silent.
I
also need to point out here that in the interview I discussed in my previous post on this subject, Dr. Maté stated that medical staff and first
responders must lose their jobs if they don’t want to get the vaccine because
they will be in contact with the vulnerable and the elderly. But here was the
elderly Dr. Maté sitting in a small studio for three
hours with the unvaccinated Joe Rogan! That’s a risk he chose to take, I
suppose, but still it suggests that he knew the risk was no greater than that
posed by all the vaccinated people he encounters. Furthermore, if young people
must lose their jobs to make the vulnerable feel safe, then the vulnerable have
to stay home as much as possible. He is not setting an example as a vulnerable
person doing the responsible thing by refraining from travel and minimizing
contact with society. Not everyone can do this, but he certainly has the
financial resources to stay home and arrange for the necessities of life to be
brought to him. His presence on the Joe Rogan show is probably a tacit
admission that his previous stance was wrong, but nonetheless he prefers not to
discuss it.
On
the topic of staying silent, I will leave the last word to Dr. Maté himself, then
end with a reference to a peer-reviewed article in the journal Vaccine
that shows a clear signal of vaccine injury occurring at a rate above what has
caused other vaccines to be discontinued. There are dozens of similar articles
and thousands of testimonies that point in the same direction, for anyone who
cares to look for them.
Gabor
Maté in an interview with Russell Brand in May 2021:
Albert
Speer was a Nazi armaments minister and economics minister ... He was a war
criminal and condemned as such ... he said he was often asked, “What did you
know?” And he said what he knew wasn’t the right question ... The question is
what he could have known if he had wanted to. He said he had plenty of hints
... So the question is not what he knew. It is what he could have known had he
wanted to know. We’re not living in Nazi Germany ... You can get all the
information you want, so if anybody these days doesn’t know, it’s not because
the information is not available. It’s not what you know. It’s what you could
know if you wanted to find out.[10]
Following
this reasoning, here is an example of information that is accessible to those
who look for it:
The most conservative, minimalist
conclusion one can draw from this study is that [the mRNA] vaccines may not
confer net benefit to everyone, and therefore, universal mandates were dangerous,
unscientific, and unethical. They led to marginalization and systemic
discrimination of the unvaccinated and untold preventable vaccine injuries
among healthy people in particular. Not to mention all the economic, cultural,
and political divisions that were exacerbated.[11]
These
are the words of Rav Avora in his discussion of a research paper published in Vaccine
in September 2022. In that paper, the authors adopt the usual tentative and
unprovocative language of the genre, but the wording used in the article is
stunning enough for those who can read the dangerous current moving under the
calm surface, especially for what it implies with the phrase “stratified
according to risk,” which refers to healthy people who were at lower risk from
the virus but at higher risk from the mRNA injections:
Combined, the mRNA vaccines were
associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of
12.5 per 10,000 vaccinated ... Combined, there was a 16 % higher risk of
serious adverse events in mRNA vaccine recipients: risk difference 13.2 ...
risk ratio 1.16 ... The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our
study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those
that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes. These
analyses will require public release of participant level datasets ... [these
results] raise concerns that mRNA vaccines are associated with more harm than
initially estimated at the time of emergency authorization.[12]
So
there it is. This article in Vaccine won’t be discussed on legacy media
or by people seeking a large audience with their books to sell and places to go
that require proof of vaccination. But the information is available. It is not
a question of what you know. It’s a question of what you could know if you
wanted to know, and what you could say and do after you know.
From
the Joe Rogan podcast, episode 1869, September 13, 2022
Dr.
Maté: “So as you know, for example—because I’ve heard you talk about it—people
who are obese are more likely to get Covid, right? But who gets obese? … the
obesity epidemic in our society is an epidemic worldwide as globalized
capitalism extends its influence internationally... What’s happening is that
number one, people are more and more isolated, more and more stressed. Now they
eat to soothe the stress, and then, in the goodness of their hearts, the sugar
companies come along and say, “Have this food, it will make you feel better”...
So the system works elegantly … It creates the problem in the first place, and
it exploits the openings it creates. You couldn’t design a better system.”
Final
comment
The
system is actually even “better” than what the doctor describes. Dr. Maté likes
to attribute everything to trauma, but it is speculation, and probably not
helpful to tell the parents of an obese child that the cause is something they
did or didn’t do. The problem is probably caused much more by the degradation
of the food supply over the past five decades since high fructose corn syrup
became the staple sweetener. After the food companies made the population
chronically ill with manufactured high fructose corn syrup, the pharmaceutical
companies stepped in with drugs for symptomatic relief. Those helped somewhat,
but they had side effects that would require further medical interventions and
drugs. Finally, the chronically ill are susceptible to a new virus, and the
pharmaceutical industry profits again with the offer of a vaccine (which
doesn’t live up to its initial promise), and the side effects from that provide
another goldmine. In fact, the human body is being mined as if it is the last
frontier when all the inanimate resources are reaching exhaustion. Goldminers
do indeed dream of “striking a vein.”
UPDATE,
November 20, 2022
In an
interview with Jimmy Dore that was published on November 20th, 2022, Gabor Maté
addressed some of the criticisms that I have made in this post and another one
from a few months ago. In that earlier one, I cited a podcast recorded in January 2022 in which he endorsed coerced
vaccination for college students by saying the following:
What
you seem to see as dictatorial vaccine mandates, I see as necessary public
health measures... That’s not being forced. He doesn’t have to go to
university. He can choose not to. He’s not being forced to take a vaccine.
In the
November 2022 interview with Jimmy Dore, he seemed to address this
reprehensible stand he took by admitting that he had shared, to some degree, in
the lamentable venom and rancor that the pandemic produced in public discourse,
but he didn’t specify exactly what his error was. He suggested that we should
end the disdain for the so-called vaccine refusers and try to understand what
is in their minds and in their histories.
This
statement falls short of recognizing what a tremendous crime it was to coerce
people into taking a new medical treatment for which there was no long-term
safety data. The statement also suggests that the reasons people refused were
based on their psychology or emotional disposition, and not based on rational
judgment and facts about the risks of the vaccines and their lack of benefit
for people who had got immunity by infection or who were too healthy to be at
risk of a severe outcome due to infection. I give him some credit for backing
away from the uncharacteristically harsh attitude he took in early 2022, but he
has very carefully tiptoed around what he actually said (“that’s not being
coerced… he doesn’t have to go to university”). He admitted that he had not
done a lot of reading on the vaccines and all the scandals related to Anthony
Fauci and so on, so his views may continue to evolve. He said in the interview
that these issues will be discussed for a long time, and that they should be
discussed.
The
discussion of the pandemic begins at about 1:10:00 in the interview, and the
comment about “the lamentable rancor and venom” is cited below.
“How
to Heal Trauma Wounds in a Toxic Culture w/Gabor Mate,’” The Jimmy Dore Show,
November 20, 2022. https://youtu.be/MNnr2jLiZto 1:16:45~
The
really lamentable thing is the rancor, the venom on both sides. I have to say I
probably shared in it to some degree. I no longer do, you know—the disdain for
people who are so-called refusers. There are so many reasons why people might
resist the vaccine. We don’t know what’s in their minds. We don’t know what’s
in their histories. We have to be much more gentle and appreciative of
differences, and one of the things that has really gone out the window is
civility in discourse.
Notes
[1] Joe Rogan (interviewer), “#1869-Dr. Gabor Maté,” The Joe Rogan Experience (on
Spotify), September 13, 2022, 2:19:00~.
[2] Chris Hedges (interviewer), “Dr. Gabor Maté on Trauma, Addiction,
and Illness Under Capitalism,”
The Real News Network, October 14, 2022.
[3] Christian Parenti, “How the Organized Left Got Covid Wrong,
Learned to Love Lockdowns and Lost its Mind: An Autopsy,” The Grayzone, March 31,
2022.
[4] Brian Rose (interviewer), Dr. Gabor Maté: The Myth of Normal:
Trauma, Illness & Healing in a Toxic Culture, London Real. October 3, 2022.
[5] Brian Rose (interviewer), “David Icke—The Truth Behind the
Coronavirus Pandemic, COVID-19 Lockdown & The Economic Crash,” London Real, July 30, 2020.
[6] Thomas Harrington, “Why Did the Left Fail the Covid Test
So Badly?” Zero
Anthropology, September 30, 2022. This article was also published by the
Brownstone Institute. The posting on Zero Anthropology includes a useful
list of articles that have addressed this question of why “the left” failed and
let opposition to the lockdowns and mandates be erroneously tarnished as a dangerous
and misguided “right-wing” preoccupation. Many libertarian commentators saw the
entire virus phenomenon, with its unleashing of an accelerated capitalist
concentration of wealth, then, ironically, called it a “communist” takeover.
[7] Valerie Kyrie and Daniel Broudy, “Cyborgs R Us: The Bio-Nano
Panopticon of Injected Bodies?”
International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research 2, no. 2
(August 2022).
[8] Jim Kavanagh, “Devil’s Advocate: Farewell to Fauci,” The Polemicist, October
15, 2022. A highlight from this excellent review of the last three years: “My
summary take on Fauci is that he’s a self-admitted deceiver, dissembler, and,
ultimately, liar. He has played a central role in creating what is a social,
political, and epistemological (undermining our ability to know how to know),
as well as medical, disaster from which it is going to be very difficult for
U.S. society, public health, and scientific practice to recover. The reality of
what may be the worst iatrogenic medical disaster in history is becoming harder
to ignore in the wake of multiple reinfections of the multiply-vaccinated,
all-cause morbidity and mortality statistics, myocarditis and DNA-transcription
studies, Sudden Adult Death Syndrome, negative vaccine effectivity, evident
harms from lockdowns and masking, etc. … Anybody who, at this point, does not
see, based on what Fauci himself has told us [the truths he spoke before he
lied to promote the official narrative], the incompetence and incoherence of
the whole Covid project of which he was a prime director, including how unsafe
and ineffective the vaccines are and how scientifically ridiculous and
politically pernicious the mandate and passport policies were and are, is a
stubborn and dangerous fool, who will be fooled again—by their attachment to
effectively religious, anti-scientific ideologies about magic potions and
omniscient saints.”
[9] James Kunstler, “American Inquisition,” Klusterfuck Nation, October
17, 2022. This blog post is an excellent report on one of the many witch-hunts
being carried out against Covid dissenters.
[10] Russell Brand (interviewer), “Israel/Palestine—This Needs to be Heard,” Under the Skin Podcast,
May 28, 2021.
[11] Rav Avora, “One Serious Adverse Event Per
Eight-Hundred Vaccinations,”
Substack, October 16, 2022.
[12] Joseph Fraiman et al., “Serious Adverse Events of Special
Interest Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination in Randomized Trials in Adults,” Vaccine 40, no. 40
(September 22, 2022): 5798-5805.
No comments: